SearchSearch

Clear answers for every role in food safety

From recording test results to overseeing food safety across facilities, find the tools and information that support your decisions.

Lab / QA Technician · One result

“How do I keep test results accurate, traceable and ready to use without entering the same data twice?”

Bring instrument and external lab results together, keep their context attached, and simplify routine reporting.

A lab technician inserting an ATP test device into an EnSURE Touch, viewed from the back.
What gets in the way today
  • Every result is entered twice — once on the instrument, once in a spreadsheet
  • Third-party lab reports arrive by email as PDFs and sit in a folder
  • The weekly summary is rebuilt by hand, the same way, every week
  • A question about last quarter means opening six files to answer it
What changes
  • EnSURE® Touch and BAX® Q7 sync on their own, so nothing is retyped
  • Outside lab results, LIMS exports and old spreadsheets import by CSV or API
  • Reports run to a schedule and arrive in the right inbox without being asked
  • Every result keeps who, where and when attached, and stays searchable
Key Features
Results tableData importScheduled reports
Capabilities used
Data CentralizationUniversal Data IntegrationAutomated Reporting
Sanitation Manager · One shift

“Was sanitation completed correctly, and what still needs attention?”

Track completed tasks, review verification results and follow up on open corrective actions while the shift is still on site.

A sanitation manager checking a rugged tablet in a just-cleaned wet processing room.
What gets in the way today
  • The schedule lives on a whiteboard and the sign-off lives on a clipboard
  • Proof of a clean is a signature on paper that nobody can find in April
  • Verification swabs come back after the line has already restarted
  • Corrective actions are chased by text message and remembered, not recorded
What changes
  • Sanitation schedules assign work by shift, task and person
  • Sign-off happens on the floor, on a phone, as the work finishes
  • Verification results attach to the task that produced them
  • Every corrective action carries an owner, a due date and a closing record
Key Features
Tonight’s scheduleTask sign-offCorrective actions
Capabilities used
Sanitation SchedulingMobile Sign-offVerification Results
Plant / Operations Manager · One plant

“Are we ready to start production, and what needs resolving first?”

Review sanitation progress, verification results and unresolved issues so your team can address delays and make informed start-up decisions.

A plant operations manager in hi-vis scanning a running bottling line.
What gets in the way today
  • Sanitation over-runs are discovered at start-up, when the line is already waiting
  • Nobody agrees how long a clean actually takes, so the plan is a guess
  • A failed swab stops a line and no one can say quickly what caused it
  • Labour, water and chemical use are estimated rather than measured
What changes
  • Scheduled against actual time, per task, per line, per shift
  • Re-cleans and retests are visible as they build, not after the downtime
  • A failure links straight to the task, the person and the previous result
  • Resource planning runs on recorded times instead of estimates
Key Features
Schedule vs actualLine statusRetest volume
Capabilities used
Work SchedulingResource ManagementTrend Analysis
QA / Food Safety Manager · Your food safety program

“Is our food safety program working, and where do we need to act?”

Monitor testing activity, spot recurring failures and review open corrective actions, with records ready to support inspections and audits.

A QA manager and a line operator talking beside a running production line.
What gets in the way today
  • Every site keeps its records in the format that suited whoever set it up
  • Audit preparation is three days of assembling evidence from other people
  • A trend is only visible once somebody sits down and builds the chart
  • Chasing sites for overdue tests is a standing weekly job
What changes
  • One sampling plan and one set of thresholds, pushed to every site
  • Reporting maps to HACCP, FSSC 22000 and ISO, and compiles in minutes
  • Trend analysis and environmental maps run continuously, not on request
  • Overdue tests and open corrective actions surface without a phone call
Key Features
Environmental mapAudit packSampling plans
Capabilities used
Sampling Plan ModuleEnvironmental MapsAudit-ready Reporting
VP / Director of Food Safety · Every site, every standard

“Are we exposed, and what evidence supports our answer?”

See where risk is building across facilities, whether corrective actions are closing, and what the records show.

A food safety director walking a plant aisle with two site staff.

You are expected to protect consumers, safeguard the brand, support every facility, satisfy customers, prepare for audits and drive improvement — while operations move fast and every site has its own constraints.

When the business asks “are we exposed?”, confidence is not the answer. Evidence is.

What gets in the way today
  • Every facility documents differently, so nothing compares cleanly
  • Data lives in binders, spreadsheets, LIMS, email and point tools
  • Non-compliance is discovered too late to do anything cheap about it
  • Audit preparation becomes a scramble across sites and time zones
  • Corporate cannot see a failure repeating in three plants at once
What changes
  • Standardized programmes, KPIs, audit routines and documentation workflows
  • Food safety, sanitation, testing and external lab data in one place
  • Alerts, dashboards and trend analysis surface issues while they are small
  • Audit-ready records, reports and traceable corrective actions stay available
  • Recurring issues, root causes and site-to-site trends are tracked, not guessed
Key Features
All-sites dashboardSite benchmarkAudit trail
Capabilities used
Multi-site VisibilityStandardized ProgrammesFull Audit Trail
C-suite / Corporate · The whole business

“Where are our biggest food safety risks, and are we investing in the right controls?”

Compare facility performance, identify recurring issues and use documented evidence to guide priorities and investment.

Three executives reviewing a multi-site performance dashboard in a corporate meeting room.
What gets in the way today
  • Food safety reaches the leadership team monthly, as somebody’s slides
  • Nobody can price what retests, re-cleans and downtime actually cost
  • A customer audit or a recall question needs a week of preparation
  • Site performance is described anecdotally, by whoever is in the room
What changes
  • One dashboard covering every site, refreshed as the work happens
  • Retest, re-clean and audit-preparation time measured instead of estimated
  • Evidence for a customer or a regulator assembled in minutes
  • Sites benchmarked against each other on measures that mean the same thing
Key Features
Executive dashboardSite benchmarkCost of quality
Capabilities used
Enterprise DashboardsBenchmarkingUnlimited Users